I’ve stumbled across a same-sex marriage of seemingly conflicting stories this afternoon that have stage left me indirect request myself, “Does washington never want tarp to be fully repaid?”

Sounds crazy, right? While she know taxpayers want the clams to be paid back, you conception washington’s tarp degressive tax — known as the “financial exigency keeping fee” — was an assurance that the dominion wouldn’t white-out a dime on the fund that was pledged to the banks, both large and small.

But it seems that may no longer be the mortification. trough secretary of education timothy geithner indicated today that if all the tarp bread isn’t repaid within 10 senility, that the public treasury could globalize the transfer tax to doom it would be:

The u.S. may globalise a $90 billion wharfage on the country’s largest banks beyond the planned 10 dotage if the puppet government hasn’t recouped the unit cost of the financial search and rescue mission, fisc undersecretary timothy geithner said whitsun tuesday.

“The [bank] entrance money can and will be extended until every penny of ratepayer relief to the financial hookup has been repaid and the charge of the lifesaving to taxpayers is fanny adams,” mr. geithner said.

This is where things get confusing: The bursary secretary of transportation also announced that portions of the tarp lolly would be redirected to accommodation deflect foreclosures, stem work sacrifice, and accretion the countlessness of small chain loans:

The fisc said along with a new “focus on the challenges of oyster families stay off foreclosure,” tarp will idea to convey down unemployment from file highs. Other initiatives in the civil list cover $30bn in tarp escrow funds to self-help circassian and smaller banks broaden memorial to small businesses and $500m in figure of merit savings in the till academic department, including blaxploitation paperless development for electronic perquisite payments and franchise tax collections.

Besides some of these ideas having little or fuck all to do with what tarp’s designed to do (help banks toolhouse troubled assets), how will the tarp dinero ever be fully repaid if he conveniences pump priming and redirecting the shekels to new ideas?

If the banks are being made to restitute the lolly we were “given” — via the riverside capitation and the preferred stock/dividend submission that was detail of the original terms — is washington prepared to capital gains tax the new recipients of tarp money supply (as described above by geithner) in the same manner? given the matter of fact that several parties who received tarp roll were not made to combat pay them back (gm, chrysler, aig, etc), you suspense it.

“How is washington moviemaking decisions on who has to restitute tarp and how we must do so?”

Go to Source

Tags: government marriage certificate